Proposition 40 requires billionaires who were California residents on January 1, 2026 to pay a one-time state tax equal to 5 percent of their net worth, due in 2027.
Source: Legislative Analyst's Office (LAO)California·Election: 2026-11-03Upcoming
Not yet voted on. Outcomes will be added after the election.
Imposes One-Time Tax on Certain Taxpayers. Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute.
Imposes one-time tax of up to 5% on certain taxpayers with covered assets valued over $1 billion; covered assets include businesses, securities, art, collectibles, and intellectual property, but exclude real property and some pensions and retirement accounts. Allocates 90% of these tax revenues for health care, 10% for food assistance or education-related programs; prohibits using revenues to replace existing funding for these purposes. Exempts such tax revenues from constitutional requirements for school funding, budget reserves, and state spending limit. Summary of Legislative Analyst's Estimate of Net State and Local Government Fiscal Impact: Temporary state revenue increase from a new wealth tax on billionaires. These wealth tax revenues probably would add up to tens of billions of dollars spread over several years. Possible ongoing decrease of less than $1 billion per year in state income tax revenue collected from billionaires.
Read full ballot textAdditional context
Proposition 40 is on the November 3, 2026 statewide ballot and has not been voted on yet. The neutral descriptions come from the Legislative Analyst's Office and the official voter guide; campaign statements come from the arguments for and against in the official voter guide. Campaign-finance totals are pre-election figures and will change.
Who's behind it
From the official voter guide. Signers are the people each campaign chose to sign its argument, not a list of who paid for it (see “How much money” below).
Signed the argument in favor
- Suzanne JimenezChief of Staff, SEIU-United Healthcare Workers West
- Victoria BarronPatient Access Specialist, Planned Parenthood of Pacific Southwest
- Denise Robb, Ph.D.Member of American Federation of Teachers Local 1521, Los Angeles College Faculty Guild
Source: California Secretary of State
Signed the argument against
- René Bravo, M.D.President, California Medical Association
- Francisco SilvaCEO, California Primary Care Association
- Dr. Debra SchadePresident, California School Boards Association
- April O'ConnorTeacher, California Teachers Association
- Rob GutierrezPresident, California Taxpayers Association (CalTax)
- Chris HannanPresident, State Building and Construction Trades Council of California
Source: California Secretary of State
How much money
Raised to support
$32,238,663.94
- Yes on 40 - Billionaire Tax Now, sponsored by Service Employees International Union - United Healthcare Workers West (Filer ID 1484470). Contributions from 2025 through 9/29/2026: $31,862,430.53 on its campaign statements through 9/19/2026, plus $376,233.41 in late contributions reported since. Includes $10,271,198.50 in non-monetary (in-kind) contributions. Largest funders: SEIU-United Healthcare Workers West ($21.5M), its Political Issues Committee ($7.5M) and its PAC ($2M). Its latest statement adds "No on 41 & 42" to the committee's name. Pre-election figure, will change.Totals through 2026-09-29 · California Secretary of State (Cal-Access)
Raised to oppose
$84,800,000.00
- $73,721,279.44No on Prop 40 - Doctors, Teachers, Small Businesses, Working Families and Public Safety Against the Reckless Wealth Tax Experiment (Filer ID 1492108), the main opposition committee. Contributions through 9/25/2026: $56,721,279.44 on its campaign statements through 9/19/2026, plus a $17,000,000 late contribution on 9/25/2026. $73.5M came from Building a Better California (Filer ID 1486767), a committee that also funds other 2026 measure campaigns; the rest from the California Primary Care Association Advocates ($100K), the California Medical Association ($100K) and Stop the Squeeze ($21,279.44, counted here and subtracted from that committee's row). Pre-election figure, will change.Totals through 2026-09-25 · California Secretary of State (Cal-Access)
- $10,450,000.00Golden State Promise - No on Prop 40 (Filer ID 1486695). Contributions through 9/19/2026, with no late contributions reported since: Ripple Labs ($5M), Chris Larsen ($5M) and the California Business Roundtable Issues PAC ($450K). Pre-election figure, will change.Totals through 2026-09-19 · California Secretary of State (Cal-Access)
- $378,720.56Stop the Squeeze - No on Prop 40 (Filer ID 1485007). Raised $400,000 in 2025 and 2026 through 9/19/2026 (Daniel Tierney $200K; Intersect USA, LLC $100K; Ronald Conway $100K), minus the $21,279.44 it gave to the main No on Prop 40 committee (Filer ID 1492108) on 9/18/2026, which is counted in that committee's row. Pre-election figure, will change.Totals through 2026-09-19 · California Secretary of State (Cal-Access)
- $250,000.00Californians Against Tax Increases, sponsored by the California Business Roundtable - No on 40 (Filer ID 1485228). Contributions from 2025 through 9/29/2026: the California Business Roundtable Issues PAC ($245K) and the California Business Properties Association Issues PAC ($5K). Pre-election figure, will change.Totals through 2026-09-29 · California Secretary of State (Cal-Access)
What each side claims
26 claims · 0 metricsEach claim states an intended outcome of the measure. Metrics are appended over time and never replaced — every entry keeps its original date and citation.
Proposition 40 lets taxpayers spread their wealth tax payments over five years, but they would have to pay more to do so.
Source: Legislative Analyst's Office (LAO)Proposition 40 generally excludes real estate, pensions, and retirement accounts from the wealth tax.
Source: Legislative Analyst's Office (LAO)Proposition 40 requires 90 percent of the wealth tax money to be spent on health care services for the public. The state would decide how and when to spend it.
Source: Legislative Analyst's Office (LAO)Proposition 40 requires the rest of the wealth tax money to be spent on education, food assistance, and administering the wealth tax.
Source: Legislative Analyst's Office (LAO)Proposition 40 exempts the wealth tax money from State Constitution rules that limit state spending and that require the state to spend a certain amount on schools and community colleges.
Source: Legislative Analyst's Office (LAO)The Legislative Analyst estimated that the state probably would collect tens of billions of dollars from the Proposition 40 wealth tax, spread across several years, but that exactly when and how much is very hard to predict.
Source: Legislative Analyst's Office (LAO)The Legislative Analyst estimated that billionaires' responses to Proposition 40, such as leaving California, probably would reduce state income tax revenues by less than $1 billion per year.
Source: Legislative Analyst's Office (LAO)The Legislative Analyst estimated that the state's costs to administer the Proposition 40 wealth tax could be tens of millions of dollars per year for several years, paid from the new wealth tax revenues.
Source: Legislative Analyst's Office (LAO)"Prop. 40 makes approximately 200 California billionaires pay a modest, one-time tax on their global wealth to keep local hospitals and ERs open and healthcare affordable for millions of Californians."
Source: California Secretary of State"It will raise about $100 billion to replace the funding Trump and his billionaire donors took from working people to line their pockets."
Source: California Secretary of State"The funds will go to life-saving medical care for seniors, veterans, and families."
Source: California Secretary of State"It will allow millions of Californians to keep their health insurance and not see their premiums skyrocket."
Source: California Secretary of State"It will prevent mass teacher layoffs in our public schools..."
Source: California Secretary of State"It will...keep children fed through food assistance programs."
Source: California Secretary of State"You pay your taxes out of every paycheck, but billionaires pay much lower rates than working families."
Source: California Secretary of State"Prop. 40 enacts a one-time tax paid ONLY by Californians worth more than $1 billion, a small group of people who together hold $2 trillion in wealth..."
Source: California Secretary of State"Prop. 40 is a BILLIONAIRE tax. It cannot be applied to anyone else—working people already pay more than their fair share."
Source: California Secretary of State"Prop. 40 won't fix healthcare or lower costs for consumers..."
Source: California Secretary of State"...it's a blank check that ALLOWS THE LEGISLATURE TO GIVE BILLIONS TO HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANIES, with no guarantees struggling families see a single cent to help them with high healthcare costs."
Source: California Secretary of State"A study by Stanford University economists found the tax will cost California $25 billion as the tax drives companies and wealthy residents out-of-state."
Source: California Secretary of State"The special interests behind the measure wrote it to give the State Legislature power to amend the measure—without voter approval."
Source: California Secretary of State"Independent legal analysis found Prop. 40 opens the door to expanding the tax to the assets of ALL Californians—to your savings, home equity and even retirement funds."
Source: California Secretary of State"Prop. 40 would be the first in California history to tax retirement accounts—a dangerous precedent."
Source: California Secretary of State"Prop. 40 won't help schools: it exempts itself from California's voter-approved protections for school funding. That SHORTCHANGES PUBLIC SCHOOLS $3 BILLION ANNUALLY."
Source: California Secretary of State"...Prop. 40 includes no accountability, transparency or oversight provisions to ensure funds are spent as intended."
Source: California Secretary of StateSources
- California Secretary of State (vig.cdn.sos.ca.gov)Government / Official Record · accessed 2026-10-01
- California Secretary of State (vig.cdn.sos.ca.gov)Government / Official Record · accessed 2026-10-01
- California Secretary of State (vig.cdn.sos.ca.gov)Advocacy / Campaign Committee · accessed 2026-10-01
- California Secretary of State (Cal-Access) (cal-access.sos.ca.gov)Government / Official Record · accessed 2026-10-01
- California Secretary of State (Cal-Access) (cal-access.sos.ca.gov)Government / Official Record · accessed 2026-10-01
- California Secretary of State (Cal-Access) (cal-access.sos.ca.gov)Government / Official Record · accessed 2026-10-01
- California Secretary of State (Cal-Access) (cal-access.sos.ca.gov)Government / Official Record · accessed 2026-10-01
- California Secretary of State (Cal-Access) (cal-access.sos.ca.gov)Government / Official Record · accessed 2026-10-01
- Legislative Analyst's Office (LAO) (lao.ca.gov)Government / Official Record · accessed 2026-10-01